Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 11.66 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50's overall score of 81.2. Even though LG V60 ThinQ is better than the Motorola Edge 50, we must note that it's also a older, thicker and heavier phone. These devices have Android OS, but LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50. They have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 features a much better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1220 x 2712 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a much less MP resolution back camera and a lot lower video definition, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 and LG V60 ThinQ have incredibly similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.