Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than the Motorola Edge 50, having a score of 91.2 against 81.2. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG Wing has 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. Although it's the best we are comparing, we must note that it is also a notably older, a lot thicker and a lot heavier cellphone.
Motorola Edge 50 has a better looking screen than LG Wing, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel count per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712. LG Wing has much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory, the LG Wing also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Wing features a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50. They have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 counts with longer battery lifetime than LG Wing, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size. LG Wing takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the LG Wing also counts with better video frame rates and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.