Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a score of 85.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 global score. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 body is noticeably thinner than Motorola Edge 50, although it is notably heavier and was released many years before. These phones include Android operating system, but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Motorola Edge 50 features just a bit better looking screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit lower 1220 x 2712px resolution, it also counts with a much brighter display and a just a bit higher pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photographs in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 has just a bit longer battery performance than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.