Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a general score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 construction is noticeably newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it's much thicker and way heavier. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a slightly better screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a bit inferior amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a greater storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 50 captures greater pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a way larger sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures, a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 features a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.