Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than the Moto Z2 Play, getting an 81.2 score against 77.4. Motorola Edge 50's design is a lot newer than Moto Z2 Play's, although it's heavier and way thicker. Motorola Edge 50 features a brighter display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a higher resolution of 1220 x 2712px, a little greater display pixels density and a bigger screen.
The Moto Z2 Play has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Moto Z2 Play features more memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size. Motorola Edge 50 features a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a back camera with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.