Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-08-08 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z3's overall score of 77.6. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 has the previous 14 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 50 is a extremely newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z3, although it is somewhat thicker and heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 features a sharper display than Moto Z3, because it has a better 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution, a just a bit higher display density and a little bit larger display. The Motorola Moto Z3 features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a way better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a larger aperture to take better low light images and video, a much higher resolution back camera and a much bigger camera sensor.
Moto Z3 features a bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 has a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.