Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 design is incredibly newer, a little lighter and thinner than the Motorola One Hyper. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version.
The Motorola One Hyper has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 has a sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a little higher display pixels density, a bit higher 1220 x 2712px resolution and a quite larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower video definition and a camera with a much lower 50 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and video. Motorola One Hyper features a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge 50 has longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.