Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW's 80.3 score. The Motorola Edge 50 is a newer device, and it is also somewhat thinner and notably lighter than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 has newer 14 version while Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a just a little greater screen pixels density.
Motorola Edge 50 features a little bit more storage for games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 has just a little better battery duration than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.