Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a overall score of 81.2 against 75.8. These phones include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Edge 50's body is incredibly newer, thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Edge 50 has a sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a little bit higher 1220 x 2712px resolution and a quite higher screen density.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a much tinier sensor capturing lot lower quality pictures and videos and a camera in the back with a lower resolution, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger aperture.
The nubia Red Magic 3S's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 one, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S and Motorola Edge 50 both feature similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.