Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a global score of 81.2 against 76.2. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 has the newer 14 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features and increased performance. The Motorola Edge 50 construction is much newer, thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better looking display than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a slightly higher 1220 x 2712px resolution, a bit more pixels per inch of display and much more brightness. The nubia Red Magic 5S has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a tinier sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a camera with lot more MP and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.