Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50, getting a general score of 84.6 against 81.2. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Galaxy A22 5G is a much older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker phone than Motorola Edge 50. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A22 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
Motorola Edge 50 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a little larger display, a quite better 1220 x 2712 resolution and a little better pixels density. Galaxy A22 5G has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 features a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's battery performance is very similar to Motorola Edge 50's battery duration.
The Motorola Edge 50 takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.