Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is a bit better than the Galaxy A30, getting an 81.2 score against 79.6. The Motorola Edge 50 design is way newer than the Galaxy A30's, but it is a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. Motorola Edge 50 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A30, because it has a quite higher screen pixels density, a quite larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 has more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A30 has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.