Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A30s's global score of 79.8. Even though Motorola Edge 50 is incredibly newer than Galaxy A30s, it's just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version and Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a little bit larger screen, a lot better resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a much greater screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A30s features a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy A30s has a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with longer battery life than Galaxy A30s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.