Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, with an 81.3 score against 81.2. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A31 has 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. Although it's the best in this review, we must highlight that it's also notably older, just a bit heavier and a bit thicker.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a quite better resolution of 1220 x 2712px, a bit larger screen and a little bit higher pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A31 has a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A31, because it has a back camera with a higher resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos, a way larger sensor and a lot better video definition. The Motorola Edge 50 features a better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A31 features a battery performance that's just as good as the battery performance in Motorola Edge 50.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.