Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a score of 82, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50's overall score of 81.2. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A32 LTE Only has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. Despite of the fact the Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a lot older and a bit thicker than Motorola Edge 50, it's body is still noticeably lighter.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has a quite larger display, a way brighter display, a just a little higher display pixels density and a slightly higher 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a battery life that's just as good as the battery performance in Motorola Edge 50.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a lot worse 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.