Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A40, with a global score of 81.2 against 79.6. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 has newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A40 has Android 11. Motorola Edge 50's construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A40, but it's incredibly heavier.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a bit larger screen, a bit higher display density and a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels. The Motorola Edge 50 features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A40 counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 50 features a way better battery performance than Galaxy A40, because it has a 61% greater battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 shoots way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot better video resolution, a back facing camera with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.