Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is just a bit better than Galaxy A5 (2017), having an 81.2 score against 75.8. Motorola Edge 50's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A5 (2017), but it's somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 50 has a more vivid display than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger screen, a just a bit better pixel quantity per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels. The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a really longer battery life than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Motorola Edge 50 takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a much better 3840x2160 video quality, a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.