Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, having an 85.5 score against 81.2. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. Galaxy A51 is a just a bit lighter phone than the Motorola Edge 50, but they have the same thickness.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a more vivid display than Galaxy A51, because it has a little higher resolution of 1220 x 2712px, a quite bigger screen and a bit better display density. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a bigger aperture to capture better captures in low light situations and a back facing camera with more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A51 has a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 50 has superior battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.