Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 global score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a incredibly older, a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker device than Motorola Edge 50.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a quite bigger screen, a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly better 1220 x 2712 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A51 5G has a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bigger aperture for better images in low-light situations, a camera with a better 50 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.