Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 overall score. Although it's the best in our current comparison, it must be told that it's also incredibly older, a little heavier and just a little thicker. The Galaxy A52 has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a more vivid display than Galaxy A52, because it has a little bit higher pixel density, a slightly better 1220 x 2712px resolution and a little bit larger display. The Galaxy A52 has a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A52 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.