Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is much better than Motorola Edge 50, getting a 91.1 score against 81.2. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. Although it's the best phone we compare here, Galaxy A52s's construction is much older, a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than Motorola Edge 50.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels, a little bit bigger screen and a just a little greater pixels amount per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy A52s features a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A52s features more storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.