Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has an overall score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A6's overall score of 75.8. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 is newer than Samsung Galaxy A6, it's just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola Edge 50 features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a much better 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution, a bigger display and a much greater screen pixel density.
The Galaxy A6 counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing images and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a lot more mega-pixels camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.