Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than Motorola Edge 50, with a 92.9 score against 81.2. Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is extremely older, a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 50. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a just a little greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way higher 64 MP resolution back camera.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.