Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50, getting an 85.2 score against 81.2. Galaxy A9 (2018)'s design has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 50, but it is just a little heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite larger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a bit greater number of pixels in each screen inch.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 50 has a better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 50 has longer battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.