Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, having an 88.1 score against 81.2. Samsung Galaxy F62 is a older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy F62 has 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712, a just a bit higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen and much more brightness. The Galaxy F62 has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50, because it has a 40% larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy F62 captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality images, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.