Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Motorola Edge 50, getting a score of 97.6 against 81.2. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14, giving you some extra features. Samsung Galaxy Fold is a noticeably older and noticeably heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat thinner anyway.
Motorola Edge 50 features a much better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixel density and a slightly higher 1220 x 2712 resolution. The Galaxy Fold counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because it has 256 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photographs or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a way better resolution back camera.
Motorola Edge 50 features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.