Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Motorola Edge 50, with a 90.8 score against 81.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a noticeably older, just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker phone than Motorola Edge 50. The Motorola Edge 50 has a sharper screen than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a little greater pixel number in each inch of screen and a little higher 1220 x 2712px resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 has greater battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has better 30 fps video frame rates, a way better resolution back facing camera and a bigger camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.