Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Motorola Edge 50, having a 98.9 score against 81.2. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a much older, a little thicker and heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. The Motorola Edge 50 features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a quite lower resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a just a little inferior pixels count in each inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.