Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50's global score of 81.2. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. Despite of the fact Galaxy Note 3 is incredibly older and a little thicker than Motorola Edge 50, it's body is still a little bit lighter.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a bigger screen, a better resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a just a little greater screen pixels density. The Motorola Edge 50 features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.