Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 5, with an 81.2 score against 79.3. Motorola Edge 50's design is noticeably newer, but a bit heavier and a bit thicker than the Galaxy Note 5. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 has a more recent 14 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, offering some extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 and the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 count with similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a just a bit higher pixel count per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a lot more mega pixels camera in the back, a much larger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.