Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 score. The Motorola Edge 50 body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is a little heavier. Motorola Edge 50 has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3200mAh. Motorola Edge 50 shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.