Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50, having a general score of 89 against 81.2. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a just a bit lighter phone than Motorola Edge 50, but they have the same thickness. Galaxy Note10 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a quite better resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a quite bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting images or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 and Samsung Galaxy Note10 both have similar storage capacity for apps and games, they have the same 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.