Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50's overall score of 81.2. Even though Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than the Motorola Edge 50, it must be noted that it is also a much older, a little bit thicker and just a little heavier cellphone. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Note10 Lite has 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge 50 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a little better screen pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712. Galaxy Note10 Lite features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 50 features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.