Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, getting an 81.2 score against 77.7. The Motorola Edge 50 is a newer and a little thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, but it is also just a bit heavier. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
Galaxy Note3 counts with an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a better resolution of 1220 x 2712, a little better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bigger camera aperture, a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.