Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a general score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's score of 79.5. Motorola Edge 50's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy Note7, but it's just a bit heavier. Motorola Edge 50 features a much better looking display than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little inferior pixels count per inch in the screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2712, it also counts with a larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 less processing cores and lesser RAM.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh. Motorola Edge 50 captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a camera with lot more MP and a much larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.