Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Motorola Edge 50, having a 93.6 score against 81.2. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's construction has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 50, but it's just a little heavier.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per screen inch and a quite lower resolution of 1220 x 2712, they both have a display with the same size. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 and the Galaxy S10 5G both count with quite similar storage capacity to install games and applications, both have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.