Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is better than Motorola Edge 50's score of 81.2. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a way older, a little bit heavier and a bit thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 50. Galaxy S10 Lite features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50. Both have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a little bit greater screen density and a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712. Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a worse video definition, a back camera with less mega pixels, a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photos and video and a way smaller back camera sensor taking much lower quality images and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 50 features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.