Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50, getting an 86.3 score against 81.2. Galaxy S10e is a lighter phone than Motorola Edge 50, but they are 0.31inches thick. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy S10e, because it has a little higher 1220 x 2712 resolution, a bigger screen and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy S10e features a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61 percent more battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or videos in low-light environments and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.