Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Motorola Edge 50, having a 90.8 score against 81.2. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, we must highlight that it is also a noticeably older, just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker cellphone. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a brighter display than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a quite bigger screen, a just a little higher pixels amount per inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 50 has a little longer battery life than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.