Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is way better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 score. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Motorola Edge 50, we must tell that it's also a older, somewhat heavier and thicker phone.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little lower resolution of 1220 x 2712, a little worse pixels density and a quite smaller display. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery duration in Motorola Edge 50. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a way smaller sensor taking lot lower quality pictures and videos, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.