Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 50's overall score of 81.2. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a notably older, heavier and thicker cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50. Both have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a slightly better looking display than Motorola Edge 50, because it has a bit higher display density, a little bigger display, a bit brighter display and a slightly better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra have similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.