Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, getting a global score of 81.2 against 77.8. The Motorola Edge 50 is a a lot newer and thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it is heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 has older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a lower number of cores and 6 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a really larger display, a just a bit better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1220 x 2712.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a lot more mega pixels back camera, a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 features much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 has a superior battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.