Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-08-08 | -- |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 overall score. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, so it provides some additional features. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits processor and an additional graphics processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a way bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a larger camera aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.