Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 81.2 score against 81. Motorola Edge 50 is a a lot newer device, and it's also way thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. These phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slightly better 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution, a quite greater display density and a quite larger screen. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 50 has better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent more battery size. Motorola Edge 50 captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 50 MP resolution, a way higher video definition and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.