Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 general score. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's body is just a little thinner than the Motorola Edge 50, but it's a little bit heavier and was released 5 years before.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 has a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a little better pixels count in each inch in the display and a bit higher 1220 x 2712px resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip and Motorola Edge 50 both feature really similar storage to install games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.