Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than Xperia Z4v, having an 81.2 score against 78.8. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 has newer 14 version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version. The Motorola Edge 50 construction is much newer and a little bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Xperia Z4v.
Xperia Z4v has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Xperia Z4v counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a GPU. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much longer battery performance than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 takes much better photographs and videos than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a larger aperture, a lot bigger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.