Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a global score of 82.9, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 general score. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro body is incredibly older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Edge 50. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14, providing the user some extra features.
Motorola Edge 50 features a better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a bit larger display, a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels, a way brighter display and a bit higher display pixels density. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50. They have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a way smaller back camera sensor which gives a lot lower image and video quality, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a worse resolution back camera, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. Motorola Edge 50 features a much better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 has longer battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.