Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Blasting black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than Motorola Edge 50, with a score of 90.1 against 81.2. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, it must be noted that it's also an extremely older, somewhat heavier and much thicker phone. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
Motorola Edge 50 has a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a just a bit lower screen density, a quite lower resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a little smaller screen. Motorola Edge 50 and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro have similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, both have the same 256 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50. They have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera and higher video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's battery duration is just as good as the battery duration in Motorola Edge 50.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.