Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has an overall score of 81.4, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 global score. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is an much older phone than the Motorola Edge 50, but Xiaomi could make it somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features.
Motorola Edge 50 features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a little bit bigger display, a slightly higher 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution, way more brightness and a little bit higher pixels quantity in each screen inch. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE and Motorola Edge 50 both feature really similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a worse resolution back-facing camera, a worse (4K) video resolution and a lot tinier back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, they both have the same camera aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 features a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.