Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, getting an 87.9 score against 81.2. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro construction is a lot older, thicker and heavier than Motorola Edge 50.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a little higher pixel density, a way brighter screen and a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments and a tinier back camera sensor, it also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution and a much higher video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.